That’s right: Mitt and Hillary on the same team! If Hillary says it, well, it must be true!
Why is it so hard to understand: Mitt took a token salary of over 100K (not much for an important American) and retired “retroactively“.
I’m sure that an apology is on the way:
Even Paul Krugman (evil socialist economist who won some prize or other) makes the case for electing Mitt:
So like it or not, we have an election in which one candidate is proposing a redistribution from the top — which is currently paying lower taxes than it has in 80 years — downward, mainly to lower-income workers, while the other is proposing a large redistribution from the poor and the middle class to the top.
So the next time someone tut-tuts about “class warfare”, remember that the class war is already happening, in real policy — with the top .01 percent on offense.
And, even better: we are winning the war:
As a result, the arteries in American society are hardening. Social mobility is in decline, but, worse, the general drop in trust observable in all social classes is most marked among the poorest third of Americans. Nor should it be any surprise that they are “cynical and even paranoid”, writes Putnam: it is a rational response to their situation. Every institution that might be expected to alleviate their plight – family, school, voluntary organisations and church – has become dysfunctional.
Meanwhile, the rich, dealing themselves out of society’s institutions into ever stronger and sealed ghettoes of their own, become ever more ignorant of the world around them even while they ensure their off-spring scoop life’s prizes.
(ignore the British spelling).
Who wants a society where the deserving have to hang around with riff-raff?