Next project: let’s clean up youtube; right now there are just too many Satanic workout videos out there. Just look at them:
Some screen shots:
Such Satanic video cannot be tolerated! I shall have to do more research…as well as watch these videos again.
This is just beyond embarrassing:
Reporting from Washington—
President Obama for the first time has opened a sizable lead over his most likely Republican opponents, thanks to growing support among independent voters, according to a new Pew Research Center poll.The poll, released Monday, showed Rick Santorum in a virtual tie with Mitt Romney in the Republican presidential race. Santorum, the former Pennsylvania senator, has moved up as a result of his backing from Tea Party Republicans and white evangelicals. He led Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, 30%-28% among Republican and Republican-leaning registered voters in the survey, which was conduced Feb. 8-12. In a Pew survey only a month ago, Romney led Santorum 31%-14%.
*&^%$!!!! When a Republican pays big money for something, we expect it to work!!!! Now our Willard “Mitt” Romney is losing to a lunatic that has no money!!!!! How in the world are we supposed to be able to beat Barack HUSSEIN Obama like this??????
I expect the Romney SuperPAC to commence carpet bombing Mr. Santorum at once!!!
For crying out loud Mr. Romney, throw the idiots a bone, will you??? Tell them anything; denounce heliocentric astronomy…..call for the death penalty for witches…..just throw the morons a bone, ok?????
Goodness gracious!!!!
So what do you have to say to THAT? Hmmmm?
Really, after 1990, we had 7 years in a row that were cooler, and after 1998 we had 4 years in a row that were cooler. What kind of global warming is that?
A true Republican would ignore socialist NASA and the socialist New York Times.
I admit that I don’t understand why they would run a image of the predicted Presidential Electoral College map in the science section.
Willard Mittens Romney lost 4 states to this clown????
What is our party coming to?
Here is our weekly Prayer Warrior Project for Promise Keeper groups: every PK group ought to divvy up Twitter accounts and seek women who display themselves for all to see.
We should then set up a data base so other Godly Christian Republican men can keep tabs….
just look at what is out there!
Here is a montage of this Scarlet Woman’s photos:
What should we do about this????? More investigation is called for!!!!
Ok, last night, crazy Rick Santorum (please don’t google this) blew us away.
But the campaign of Willard “Mittens” Romney told us all not to worry:
Friend,
Please see below a memo from our Political Director Rich Beeson, “The Road Ahead – A Reality Check.”
Some quick takeaways:
No delegates are being selected today. The delegate count tomorrow morning will remain the same as it is today. Gov. Romney has a significant delegate lead – he is the only candidate to have earned delegates in every available contest.
Missouri is strictly a beauty contest (see ABC News: “Why Missouri Is Holding a ‘Meaningless’ Primary”). The primary being held today is completely divorced from any delegate allocation, and Missouri will hold an entirely separate caucus next month. We plan to compete in the actual Missouri contest in March.
As our campaign has said from the outset, Mitt Romney is not going to win every contest. John McCain lost 19 states in 2008, and we expect our opponents will notch a few wins, too. But unlike the other candidates, our campaign has the resources and organization to keep winning over the long run. A winning conservative message, hard work, and old-fashioned delegate math will win this race for Governor Romney.
Thanks,
Matt RhoadesP.S. Donate $11.44 today and help us get to the 1,144 delegates we need to win the nomination
Really….we shouldn’t worry….too much….
I was on Intrade today and this is what I saw:
This is outrageous! Don’t think that the LIE-beral E-lite aren’t having fun with this.
Why oh why is Willard “Mittens” Romney not getting any love?
Even worse, we find that the riff-raff are revolting against our Anointed One:
In 2010, Christine O’Donnell was a Tea Party favorite and fundraising powerhouse. Two years later, the former U.S. Senate candidate from Delaware is nearly out of money and under fire from her former allies on the grassroots right.
The News-Journal of Delaware reported on Sunday that ChristinePAC, O’Donnell’s political action committee, had only $10,260 cash on hand in December. In the six months before that, according to the group’s financial disclosure forms, only 16 people donated more than $200 dollars to ChristinePAC.
[...]Her prospects may also be dim because of O’Donnell’s faltering relationship with the Tea Party. Grassroots conservatives fueled her primary win in 2010, but many were turned off by her endorsement of establishment favorite Mitt Romney in this year’s GOP presidential race. She also failed to pick up a lucrative gig as a cable news analyst, as many expected she would.
Evan Queitsch, a former O’Donnell volunteer and current candidate for the Delaware state Senate, blasted O’Donnell after the endorsement despite her $600 donation to his campaign.
“Do not insult our intelligence by trying to claim [Romney has] conservative credentials that don’t exist,” Queitsch wrote in a blog post. “How DARE you insult our intelligence by pretending like we haven’t looked at the man’s record.”
Come on!!! The lonely men are resisting our lovely drunken ladybug?
Now even our favorite tranny conservative blonde is coming under attack by those who don’t know their place:
When this shrill harridan decided to support the Mittster, she lost the teahadist wing of the Republican Party. You could find it at freerepublic dot com, but I shan’t link to it here. Wearing my HazMat suit, I’ve selected some of their derision, below, for your amusement and delight. But first, this disclaimer:
Ann Coulter is a woman. While you’ll see quotes from FReepsters that attempt to smear her by calling her a transwoman, this ain’t true. Just as when Ann Coulter called John Edwards a “fag,” slurs based on immutable characteristics such as gender orientation, sexuality, skin color, etc. do not hurt their intended targets in the way they hurt our brothers and sisters who have those characteristics. Anyone who intimates that Ann Coulter is not a woman, in this diary’s comments, will have their comments swiftly hidden (one hopes.) TUs, please help if necessary. I’m sorry to have to write this here, but the history is clear.
Now, onward to the freude!
What a fool she is. When Romney gets what he wants he will dump his whore to the curb like the pimp he is. Ann tried to jump the shark and ended up being eaten by a megalodon which promptly spit her chewed body out because it had no meat on it.
[...]
STFU, Ann. You no longer matter to conservatives, you sold out for political expediency and “electability,” what you say no longer matters. Go home and eat a couple of Whoppers and large fries.
Yep! No longer does Ann get to be a skinny, desirable, attractive (to Republicans) woman. Since all women only have value in proportion to their looks, the Republicans now must sentence Ann to get fat.
Even if she believes Romney is the best candidate her shrill all-or-nothing hawking of him has greatly lowered her stock among conservatives.
Shrill? Are you talking about the same Ann Coulter?? heh.
Even worse, we have Clint Eastwood making socialist commercials!
This cannot stand folks; we have to whip the under 100K crowd back into shape; they are getting too big for their britches…and those are usually pretty big britches.
Side note: if you want to cure gay males, have them go to a male locker room when a bunch of the tea party males are in there….yech!
Guess what: no one really cares about Joseph Smith, golden plates, magic underwear and the like. Willard “Mittens” Romney understands that it is about tax breaks for the worthy (wealthy Republicans). Funny that the atheists see this and some of our conservative friends do not.
Yes, Dr. Paul Krugman is a well paid, very famous professor who won a Nobel Prize in economics. But like most LIE-berals, he just doesn’t get it. Consider his attacks on Republicans…
Case One: he attacks David Brooks (ok, he is a RINO but hey, at the New York Times that is the best that we can do):
The good folks at EPI are upset by my colleague David Brooks’s claims that the gap between the top 20 and the bottom 30, not the gap between the top 1 and everyone else, is what really matters.
As you might guess, I’m with Larry Mishel on this; but I thought it might be useful to have a calm discussion of what someone might mean by saying that the rise of the top 1 percent isn’t important.
One thing such a person might mean is that it’s unimportant in quantitative, dollars and cents terms. But this is just false. The CBO inequality report confirms what independent studies have been saying: the rise of the top 1 percent has absorbed a large fraction (almost half, by my reckoning), of economic growth, leaving a much smaller pie for everyone else. If we look at Gini indexes, a measure of overall inequality, CBO has calculated them both with and without the top 1 percent:
He goes on to point out that 45 percent of the economic growth has gone to the top 1 percent.
Our take: there is one thing wrong with that: it is only 45 percent! Why should the sub 250K per year riff-raff (and those who would be at 250K if it weren’t for Barack HUSSEIN Obama) get anything?
Case Two: he attacks Willard “Mittens” Romney:
Still, I believe Mr. Romney when he says he isn’t concerned about the poor. What I don’t believe is his assertion that he’s equally unconcerned about the rich, who are “doing fine.” After all, if that’s what he really feels, why does he propose showering them with money?
And we’re talking about a lot of money. According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, Mr. Romney’s tax plan would actually raise taxes on many lower-income Americans, while sharply cutting taxes at the top end. More than 80 percent of the tax cuts would go to people making more than $200,000 a year, almost half to those making more than $1 million a year, with the average member of the million-plus club getting a $145,000 tax break.
And these big tax breaks would create a big budget hole, increasing the deficit by $180 billion a year — and making those draconian cuts in safety-net programs necessary.
Which brings us back to Mr. Romney’s lack of concern. You can say this for the former Massachusetts governor and Bain Capital executive: He is opening up new frontiers in American politics. Even conservative politicians used to find it necessary to pretend that they cared about the poor. Remember “compassionate conservatism”? Mr. Romney has, however, done away with that pretense.
True, but why is this bad? It is only bad to a LIE-beral. The deserving get the breaks and the slackers get the shaft which is exactly as it should be. Really, it isn’t as if the 5 figure income slimebags have ever amounted to anything…or ever will.
As usual, we take a peek at the internet to see what actions our Promise Keepers Group should be taking…what we should be paying attention to.
This Saturday brings us to a scourge of immorality: naughty college girls. They should be in college to find a good Christian Republican husband to lead them. Instead, they do things like:
Do we have to put up with this???
